See the log in the details link for more information. View htaccess-favicon-404-fix-174940_1.patch943 bytes FAILED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] Invalid patch format in htaccess-favicon-404-fix-174940_1.patch. Do you speak about the code in comment? I suppose since the favicon module already exists, and already implements this functionality (which currently requires a core hack to .htaccess) -- this is just a justification (and vote) for inclusion navigate here
This would be in ADDITION to the problem being "solved" in order as you or mgifford suggest. Be sure that all of your files and folders are uploaded inside the public_html. (13)Permission denied: file permissions deny server access: /home/sumuser/public_html/index.html This is the most common 403 error. We shouldn't have to compromise performance because of problems on the browser (or web app) end. Useful Searches Recent Posts Resources Resources Quick Links Search Resources Most Active Authors Latest Reviews Feature Requests Defects Menu Log in Sign up The Community Forums Interact with an entire community http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11099420/file-does-not-exist-c-wamp-www-favicon-ico-in-apache-error-log
If the request is for /favicon.ico, and the file doesn't exist, return a server-generic 404. Re: When using System.IO.FileStream, I write 8 bytes, then seek to the start of the file, does the 8 bytes get flushed on seek and the buffer become a readbuffer at Drupal 8.1.0-rc1 is now available and sites should prepare to update to 8.1.0. Based on the analysis, I now vote that we fill up the accesslog with 404s.
How can we proceed after a lot of discussion here? Log in or register to post comments Comment #47 mcurry CreditAttribution: mcurry commented June 19, 2008 at 8:16pm sub Log in or register to post comments Comment #48 gpk CreditAttribution: gpk View #63 htaccess-favicon-404-fix-174940-drupal5.patch1003 [email protected] FAILED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] Unable to apply patch htaccess-favicon-404-fix-174940-drupal5.patch. The original problem was fixed a long time ago.
I've not checked if the _1 patch at #56 applies to D5 or not. Note that IE7 appears to ignore the stuff for the entire duration of your first visit to a site, so if we *don't* come up with View #78 174940-78-set-good-default-for-favicon.patch1.13 KBgagarine FAILED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] Drupal installation failed. Log in or register to post comments Comment #56 gpk CreditAttribution: gpk commented June 27, 2008 at 6:06am Version: 6.x-dev » 7.x-dev FileSize htaccess-favicon-404-fix-174940_0_followup.patch762 bytes FAILED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] Invalid patch format
The RewriteCond doesn't play nicely with Drupal in a folder, don't have any time just now but will try to roll patch with improved RewriteCond later. This may be a -p0 (old style) patch, which is no longer supported by the testbots. Log in or register to post comments Comment #22 RobLoach CreditAttribution: RobLoach commented June 4, 2008 at 2:44am FileSize favicon.patch2.31 KB FAILED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] Unable to apply patch favicon_3.patch. Correct me if i am wrong...
All searches are case-insensitive. For a certain class of problems, changing core is the right fix and this is one of them. Log in or register to post comments Comment #103 August 3, 2016 at 12:04am Dries committed 34fd475 on 8.3.x - Patch #174940 by gpk: don't generate 404s for favicons. Log in or register to post comments Comment #59 gpk CreditAttribution: gpk commented July 14, 2008 at 4:31pm Version: 6.x-dev » 5.x-dev Status: Fixed » Patch (to be ported) Per #55.
Log in or register to post comments Comment #104 August 3, 2016 at 12:05am Dries committed 34fd475 on 8.3.x - Patch #174940 by gpk: don't generate 404s for favicons. check over here The browser tries to grab the file without any reference to where it is actually linking to. I'd be happy to draft that up. Product Evangelist Staff Member Joined: May 20, 2003 Messages: 14,176 Likes Received: 167 Trophy Points: 63 Location: Pennsylvania cPanel Access Level: Root Administrator Twitter: Follow @InfoprosNetwork I'm not aware of any
Yikes. :\ Though I'm not sure of another workaround that preserves the site's branding. IE6 ignores any "shortcut icon" link defined in the page source. Log in or register to post comments Comment #79 July 12, 2012 at 11:26pm Status: Needs review » Needs work The last submitted patch, 174940-78-set-good-default-for-favicon.patch, failed testing.
This may be a -p0 (old style) patch, which is no longer supported by the testbots. At the moment Drupal serves up the full 403 page when /favicon.ico is requested, which is worse than the proposed menu callback patch. Log in or register to post comments Comment #34 Dries CreditAttribution: Dries commented June 12, 2008 at 6:51pm I don't see why having the favicon in / is any more hackish Of course, for IE users, that favicon will show up for all sites in the bookmarks, but that's a minor annoyance.
Check it out. Log in or register to post comments Comment #3 RobLoach CreditAttribution: RobLoach commented February 2, 2008 at 1:32am Title: root /favicon.ico accounts for majority of 'page not found' errors » Root Should probably go into DRUPAL-6 as well. weblink Log in or register to post comments Comment #50 gpk CreditAttribution: gpk commented June 25, 2008 at 10:36am Component: system.module » base system OK...
Log in or register to post comments Comment #44 RobLoach CreditAttribution: RobLoach commented June 16, 2008 at 3:18pm Great summary, gpk. somewhere. You can also do #91 in addition to either of the above, eliminating the bootstrap. Adds a note in .htaccess about how to skip the Drupal bootstrap when the favicon.ico requests are made, while still returning the correct shortcut icon.
Similar topics waiting for file to exist! The browser is requesting a file that does not exist. BTW: #48 works great for me but is not yet part of the .htaccess in D7. Log in or register to post comments Comment #88 klonos CreditAttribution: klonos commented October 30, 2013 at 10:28am Having the issue title be a proposed solution makes this sound like a
I rather liked your latter proposal though. Learn More.